Why the study?
Does a single 90-mg dose of ticagrelor orodispersible tablet provide bioequivalent pharmacokinetic profiles compared to the immediate-release tablet in healthy subjects?
Does a single 90-mg dose of ticagrelor orodispersible tablet provide bioequivalent pharmacokinetic profiles compared to the immediate-release tablet in healthy subjects?
Ticagrelor orodispersible tablets demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence to immediate-release tablets, providing a viable alternative for patients who have difficulty swallowing or require nasogastric administration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers alternative dosing for dysphagic or intubated patients; extends formulation options for ticagrelor in ACS.
Ticagrelor is an antiplatelet agent for patients with acute coronary syndrome or a history of myocardial infarction. Two studies compared pharmacokinetic profiles of orodispersible (OD) ticagrelor tablets versus immediate-release (IR) tablets in Western and Japanese subjects. Both studies were open-label, randomized, crossover, single-center trials. Thirty-six healthy subjects (94% white, 6% other race; Western study NCT02400333) and 42 Japanese healthy subjects (Japanese study NCT02436577) received a single 90-mg ticagrelor dose as an OD tablet [with/without water, and via a nasogastric tube (Western study only)], and an IR tablet; washout between treatments was ≥7 days. Assessments included ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX (active metabolite) plasma concentrations for pharmacokinetic analyses, and safety evaluations. In the Western study, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) were within the acceptance interval (80%–125%) for OD tablets (with/without water, via a nasogastric tube) versus the IR tablet; except for an ~15% lowering of ticagrelor C max (90% CI: 76.77%–93.78%) for the OD tablet taken with water. In the Japanese study, 90% CIs of the GMRs for AUC and C max of both ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were all within the acceptance intervals for the OD (with/without water) versus IR tablet. No new safety issues were identified. Ticagrelor administered as an OD tablet to Western (without water, and via a nasogastric tube) and Japanese (with/without water) subjects was bioequivalent to the IR tablet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teng et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: