Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The extent of adsorption (Γ 2 1 ) of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), myristyltrimethylammonium bromide (MTAB), and dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) from aqueous solution onto a cellulose−water interface has been measured analytically in a wide range of surfactant concentrations below and above the critical micelle concentration (cmc) at different physicochemical conditions and in the presence of different electrolytes and urea. Γ 2 1 is found to increase with increase of bulk surfactant concentration C 2 until it reaches a maximum value Γ 2 m when C 2 reaches a critical value, C 2 m . With further increase of C 2 beyond C 2 m, Γ 2 1 decreases from Γ 2 m and becomes zero with attainment of surface azeotropic state at a surfactant concentration C 2 azeo . For C 2 > C 2 azeo, values of Γ 2 1 are negative due to the excess hydration of cellulose fibril and desorption of surfactant micelles from the surface to the bulk phase. The value of Γ 2 m depends upon the different physicochemical conditions and presence of different electrolytes and urea. Values of C 2 m lie considerably below the cmc in most cases. Γ 2 m decreases with decrease of hydrocarbon chain length of surfactant molecules, and in the case of DTAB all values of Γ 2 1 are negative. The results also predict involvement of hydrophobic interaction in the adsorption process. The standard free energy change Δ G ° for the transfer of surfactant molecules to 1 kg of cellulose at the state of surface saturation has been calculated using an integrated form of the Gibbs adsorption equation. The values of Δ G ° follow the same order as those of Γ 2 m . The average slope of the linear plot of Δ G ° vs Γ 2 m is equal to −34.3 ± 0.1 kJ/mol. This corresponds to the standard free energy change (Δ G B °) for the transfer of 1 mol of surfactant from the bulk solution to the cellulose surface when bulk mole fraction of surfactant is altered from zero to unity. The values of Δ G hi ° for different systems at high surfactant concentration (> C 2 azeo ) have been also calculated using a linear extrapolation method, and they are found to be positive in all cases due to excess positive hydration of cellulose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biswas et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: