Environmental and consumer concerns about dependence on animal-based proteins have sparked interest in sustainable alternatives, with plant-based biopolymers emerging as a promising substitute. The present study comprehensively assessed and compared the rheological and structural properties of commercial plant proteins (pea and soy) and ultrasound-extracted faba bean protein (US-FBP) to provide an extensive overview of their comparative characteristics. At 12 % protein concentration, the exponent n approached zero for soy ( n = 0.32) and pea (n = 0.56), whereas it remained higher for faba bean protein ( n = 0.69) after fitting a viscosity curve to power law model. The least gelation concentration was observed to be 10 % for US-FBP, soy and pea protein. Additionally, in situ gelation indicated strong gel formation by soy (loss factor = 0.19) compared to US-FBP (0.24) and pea protein (0.37). Secondary structure analysis using FTIR spectroscopy and water/oil absorption capacity measurements revealed significant differences between these proteins. This opens interesting possibilities for using a wide range of plant proteins in the design, formulation, and customization of next-generation plant-based foods. • US-FBP and commercial plant proteins viscosity showed different shear thinning behavior. • In situ gelation showed major differences in gel formation mechanism. • Gel strength, water holding capacity profile and viscoelastic properties of US-FBP were different from commercial proteins. • Major structural differences were observed between lab extracted proteins and commercial proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badjona et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: