This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Summary Sixteen mung bean varieties were studied for their proximate composition and protein isolates’ properties. A wide range of variation was observed: crude protein content ranged 24.26–28.50%, crude fibre 3.21–4.18%, crude fat 0.57–1.86%, ash content 3.64–4.24%, moisture 7.49–8.45% and carbohydrates 54.25–58.69%, respectively. The content of protein, ash, fat and moisture in isolated proteins ranged from 69.22% to 74.85%, 2.19% to 3.04%, 0.36% to 0.64% and 8.20% to 9.28%, respectively. The functional properties of isolated proteins analysed including water absorption capacity, oil absorption capacity, foaming capacity, foam stability, emulsifying activity and protein solubility, which ranged from 1.03 g g −1 to 2.78 g g −1 , 1.00 mL g −1 to 3.38 mL g −1 , 33.00% to 67.50%, 56.00% to 20.00%, 1.77 m 2 g −1 to 3.30 m 2 g −1 and 28.7% to 65.52%, respectively. Properties of mung bean protein isolates except oil absorption capacity were similar to most of legumes’ but lower than soybean’s. Oil absorption capacity showed negative correlation with nitrogen solubility index.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: