Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate recording of computer-generated holograms (CGH) on a phase material is not a trivial task. The range of available phase materials is large, and their suitability depends on the fabrication technique chosen to produce the hologram. We are particularly interested in low-cost fabrication techniques, easily available for any lab. In this work we present the results obtained with a wide variety of phase holographic recording materials, characterized at low spatial frequencies (≤32 lp mm −1 ) which is the range associated with the technique we use to produce the CGHs. We have considered bleached emulsion, silver halide sensitized gelatin (SHSG) and dichromated gelatin. Some interesting differences arise between the behaviour of these materials in the usual holographic range (>1000 lp mm −1 ), and the low-frequency range intended for digital holography. The ultimate goal of this paper is to establish the suitability of different phase materials as the media to generate correlation filters for optical pattern recognition. In all the materials considered, the phase filters generated ensure the discrimination of the target in the recognition process. Taking into account all the experimental results, we can say that SHSG is the best material to generate phase CGHs with low spatial frequencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
rquez et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: