Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of solid solutions of zirconium titanium oxide Zr x Ti 1–x O 2 (0≤x≤1) and Pb y Zr x Ti 1–x O 2+y (0≤y≤1.15, 0≤x≤1) up to lead zirconate titanate PbZr x Ti 1–x O 3 was prepared from zirconium and titanium n-propoxide and lead acetate, dissolved in 2-methoxyethanol, by the sol-gel process. The crystallization was investigated by differential thermal analysis (DTA), and the apparent activation energies, crystallization enthalpies and Avrami exponents were determined. The crystalline phases were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Within the series of solid solutions Zr x Ti 1–x O 2 , the activation energy changes from ca. 200 kJ mol –1 for samples with low (x≤0.14) or high (x≥0.9) ZrO 2 content, to ca. 800 kJ mol –1 for intermediate ZrO 2 contents. Within the series of solid solutions Pb y Zr x Ti 1–x O 2+y , PbO lowers the activation energies and hinders the crystallite growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merkle et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: