Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Persistence represents the major reason for failure of primary macular hole repair. A variety of surgical approaches are available for treating persistent macular holes. To compare clinical outcome of re-pars plana vitrectomy combined with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% gas tamponade with heavy silicone oil in persistent macular hole. Methods: Records of 48 consecutive eyes with persistent macular holes which underwent re-pars plana vitrectomy with either heavy silicone oil (35 eyes, persistent macular–hole minimum linear diameter: 518.8 ± 171.1 µm) or autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% (13 eyes, persistent macular hole–minimum linear diameter: 454.1 ± 211.3 µm) were reviewed retrospectively. All patients underwent measurements of anatomical persistent macular hole characteristics evaluated by optical coherence tomography and visual function. Cases in which anatomical success failed after first re-pars plana vitrectomy were treated with the other surgical techniques, comparable to a cross-over design. Results: Persistent macular hole closure rate was 57.1% with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% and 45.7% with heavy silicone oil ( p = 0.102). Functional results were comparable when persistent macular hole closure was achieved ( p ⩾ 0.741), but significantly better for the autologous platelet concentrate with sulfur hexafluoride 20% group when persistent macular hole closure failed ( p = 0.019). Conclusion: Re-pars plana vitrectomy combined with autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% seems to achieve at least non-inferior persistent macular hole closure rates and comparable functional results when compared to heavy silicone oil, suggesting autologous platelet concentrate and sulfur hexafluoride 20% as a safe surgical alternative in persistent macular hole. Especially when persistent macular hole closure failed, autologous platelet concentrate with sulfur hexafluoride 20% seems to be superior regarding visual outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaub et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: