The aim of this study was to investigate the performance and feasibility of the rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) profile by comparing prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) results with ROTEM parameters. We tested external TEM (EXTEM)– and internal TEM (INTEM)–activated determinations, mainly focusing on 5 basic parameters: Clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), α angle, clot formation rate (CFR), and maximum clot firmness (MCF). We then compared PT and APTT results with ROTEM parameters. We observed no significant correlations between any of the ROTEM EXTEM or INTEM parameters and PT results. Similarly, only 1 parameter, the INTEM CT value, was significantly correlated with APTT results (r2 = 0.165, P <.05). Much work is still needed to further evaluate ROTEM assay results stemming from clinical scenarios and standard laboratory testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: