Why the study?
The combined use of cardiac contractility modulation and an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator had not been previously reported.
Is it safe and feasible to implant a cardiac contractility modulation device in a patient with an existing extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Is it safe and feasible to implant a cardiac contractility modulation device in a patient with an existing extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
This first-in-human case demonstrates the feasibility and safety of combining cardiac contractility modulation and extravascular ICD therapies in a heart failure patient.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
First-in-human CCM with prior EV-ICD feasible without interference; leaves open safety, efficacy, and broader applicability.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) improves myocardial contractility and heart failure (HF) symptoms, whereas the extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) offers defibrillation without transvenous leads. Their combined use has not been previously reported. FIRST-IN-HUMAN/EARLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This case presents the first documented implantation of CCM therapy in a patient with a prior EV-ICD. Lead placement and programming were optimized to prevent interference. Both devices functioned independently, with stable sensing and no inappropriate therapies. The patient experienced improved HF symptoms. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates the feasibility and safety of integrating CCM and EV-ICD therapy, highlighting the importance of strategic lead positioning and programming. NOVELTY: This is the first report of CCM and EV-ICD integration, demonstrating their complementary role in HF management. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: CCM and EV-ICD can be safely combined, expanding options for HF patients requiring both therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: