The Streptomyces R61 dd-peptidase, a functional model for penicillin-binding proteins, catalyzes the hydrolysis and aminolysis of d-alanyl-d-alanine-terminating peptides by specific amines. In vivo, this reaction completes bacterial cell wall biosynthesis. For in vitro studies of this enzyme to date, various nonspecific acyl-donor substrates have been employed. Recently, however, a peptidoglycan-mimetic peptide substrate, glycyl-l-alpha-amino-epsilon-pimelyl-d-alanyl-d-alanine, has been described that is much more specific for this enzyme. In this paper, we describe the synthesis and kinetic characterization of an analogous thiolester substrate, 3-(N-glycyl-l-cysteinyl)-propanoyl-d-alanyl-d-thiolactate, that the enzyme hydrolyzes and aminolyzes very efficiently (k(cat)/K(m) = 1.0 x 10(7) s(-)(1) M(-)(1)). Direct or indirect, by means of a thiol trap, spectrophotometric monitoring of the reactions of this substrate is readily achieved. Deacylation of the enzyme is rate-determining under substrate saturation conditions, and therefore the aminolysis reaction can be directly studied. The results show that d-amino acids and certain Gly-l-Xaa dipeptides and tripeptides may act as acyl acceptors at the active site of the enzyme. d-Phenylalanine and Gly-l-Phe were the most effective d-amino acid and dipeptide acceptors, respectively. On the basis of the dual specificity of the active site for acceptors (d-amino acids and Gly-l-Xaa peptides), "dual function" acceptors were designed and synthesized. Two of these, aminomalon-(N-ethyl)amide and aminomalon-(N-phenethyl)amide, were particularly effective. It did seem, however, that the observed rates of reaction of these very effective acceptors may be limited by some common, possibly physical, step. More extended, peptidoglycan-like, acceptors were found to be essentially unreactive. The reasons for this counterintuitive behavior are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: