Why the study?
Does contrast enhancement on CT help limit the differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses?
Does contrast enhancement on CT help limit the differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses?
Contrast enhancement on CT, combined with mass location and patient blood pressure, helps narrow the differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses.
CT enhancement with location and hypertension may narrow mediastinal mass differentials; leaves open confirmation in larger prospective cohorts.
The CT scans of 132 patients with mediastinal masses and CT scans from our teaching file were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the role of contrast enhancement in limiting the differential diagnosis of a mediastinal mass. Ten patients with an enhancing mediastinal mass were found. Coupled with mass enhancement, location and hypertension were helpful in limiting the differential diagnosis. Four masses were of thyroid origin, and all were contiguous with neck thyroid. All patients with functioning paragangliomas were hypertensive and all intrapericardial enhancing masses were functioning paragangliomas. A normotensive patient had a nonfunctioning aortic body paraganglioma superiolateral to the aortic arch. An enhancing mass in a similar location in a hypertensive patient was a functioning paraganglioma. Castleman disease occurred posterior to the heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spizarny et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: