Why the study?
Does nafamostat mesilate provide effective and safe anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy in dogs?
Does nafamostat mesilate provide effective and safe anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy in dogs?
Nafamostat mesilate is ineffective and causes vomiting when used as an anticoagulant for CRRT in dogs, and is therefore not recommended.
Findings caution against nafamostat mesilate for CRRT in dogs; hypothesis-generating for alternative anticoagulants in veterinary models.
We performed continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in clinically healthy dogs (n=7) to evaluate the utility of nafamostat mesilate (NM) as an anticoagulant. In 3 of the 7 dogs, CRRT had to be discontinued before the target duration due to coagulation in the extracorporeal circuit, into which NM was administered constantly at the rate of 2.0-6.0 mg/kg per hour. The rate of administration of NM was greater than the recommended dose of NM in humans. Further, all the dogs suffered vomiting during CRRT with NM infusion. We therefore recommend that NM is not used as an anticoagulant during CRRT in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MIYAMA et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: