Why the study?
While switching from boosted PIs to dolutegravir decreased proatherogenic lipid fractions in virologically suppressed HIV patients with high cardiovascular risk, its impact on subclinical cardiovascular disease was unknown.
Does switching from boosted PIs to dolutegravir reduce progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with high cardiovascular risk?
Does switching from boosted PIs to dolutegravir reduce progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with high cardiovascular risk?
Switching to dolutegravir from boosted PIs in HIV patients with high cardiovascular risk yields favorable but non-significant trends in subclinical cardiovascular disease progression at 48 weeks.
Favourable but non-significant CIMT trends with dolutegravir switch reinforce lipid benefits; longer trials needed to confirm subclinical CVD effects.
BACKGROUND: Switching from boosted PIs to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with high cardiovascular risk significantly decreased total cholesterol and other proatherogenic lipid fractions at 48 weeks. The impact of this strategy on subclinical cardiovascular disease is unknown. METHODS: NEAT022 is a European, multicentre, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial. HIV-infected adults aged >50 years or with a Framingham score >10% were eligible if plasma HIV RNA was <50 copies/mL for >24 weeks on a boosted PI-based regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to switch from boosted PIs to dolutegravir or to continue on boosted PIs. Common carotid arteries intima-media thickness (CIMT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured following a standardized protocol in a subgroup of NEAT022 study participants at baseline and at Week 48. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six patients participated in the ultrasonography and arterial stiffness substudies, respectively. In each substudy, population characteristics did not differ between arms and matched those of the main study. At 48 weeks, patients who switched to dolutegravir had lower mean progression of both right (+4 versus +14.6 μm) and left (-6.1 versus +1.6 μm) CIMT and also a smaller increase in mean PWV (+0.18 versus +0.39 m/s) than patients continuing on boosted PIs, although differences were not statistically significant. CIMT trends were consistent across Framingham score, age and country. Inconsistent effects were seen in arterial stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to continuing on boosted PIs, switching to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed patients with high cardiovascular risk showed consistent favourable although non-significant trends on CIMT progression at 48 weeks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez‐Cordón et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: