Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to improve the effects of medical therapy for cancer, we prepared magnetic nanocomposites (Fe3O4@SiO2–NH–NH[Formula: see text] as doxorubicin (DOX) carriers via two different schemes. Scheme (I): the carriers were synthesized from magnetic silica nanoparticles (Fe3O4@SiO[Formula: see text] via layer by layer modification, scheme (II): the carriers were obtained from amino-modified magnetic silica nanoparticles (Fe3O4@SiO2–NH[Formula: see text] synthesized by one-step, and followed by surface modification. In order to load DOX effectively, the surface of the carriers were further modified to make the surface with a large number of hydrazine bonds which can form a pH-sensitive bond (hydrazone bond) with DOX. The two kinds of carriers both exhibited a size around 80[Formula: see text]nm, high stability and superparamagnetic behavior. However, DOX-loaded carriers (Fe3O4@SiO2–DOX(2)) performed relatively poorer performance in terms of drug loading and releasing (the loading efficiency of DOX decreased from 67.33% to 42.15%, while the releasing efficiency of DOX decreased from 66.16% to 62.23% within 72[Formula: see text]h at pH 4.0). Water-soluble tetrazolium salts (WST-1) assays in cancer cells (Hela) demonstrated that the Fe3O4@SiO2–DOX presented high anti-tumor activity, while the carriers were nearly nontoxic. Thus, the results suggested that the magnetic nanocomposites synthesized by the two different methods both can be employed to deliver DOX, while the carriers obtained via the first method may perform better and would be applied in the field of cancer therapy in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: