Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines are lacking for prophylaxis against D alloimmunization after D-incompatible platelet transfusion. A rational basis for the application of prophylaxis would be beneficial for institutions in which inventory constraints demand the administration of large numbers of D-incompatible platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all D-incompatible platelet transfusions administered at a pediatric research hospital over a 1.5-year period. Patients exclusively received single-donor WBC-reduced platelets and did not receive RhIg immunoprophylaxis. Numbers, source, ABO type, duration of serologic follow-up, and level of RBC contamination of D-incompatible transfusions were analyzed. All positive D serologies in the institution over a 3.5-year period were examined to determine cause and potential association with platelet transfusion. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients not receiving bone marrow transplant and seven bone marrow transplant patients received 490 and 255 D-incompatible transfusions, respectively, over 1.5 years. Patients had various diagnoses, predominantly malignancies. Seventy-nine percent of D-incompatible transfusions were ABO compatible. An estimated 2300 incompatible transfusions were performed over 3.5 years. No case of D alloimmunization was detected. CONCLUSIONS: D immunoprophylaxis is generally unnecessary in pediatric oncology patients receiving D-incompatible, WBC-reduced, single-donor platelets not visibly contaminated by RBCs. Further studies to validate these observations in the pediatric population and to extend them to other population groups are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molnár et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: