Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The New Aerobics"and "R.C.A.F.5BX for Men" (Queen's Printer, Ottawa, 1959).Even in the sections on sociology there are too few recent references and an excessive number of nonscholarly citations.One final source of annoyance to the reader outside the United States is the repeated discussion of issues from a national rather than an international perspective.In summary, persons who wish an introduction to the humanistic concerns of physical education could profit from reading sections of this book.However, the treatment of the biologic aspects of movement in humans will be frustrating not only for physicians but also for students who are entering university with a much greater knowledge of body function than is displayed by this book.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1979 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: