Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study presents the results of an experimental program and analytical modeling for axial-flexural interactions of concrete-filled glass fiber–reinforced polymer tube (GFRP-CFFT) columns with and without reinforcing glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. The experimental program included four steel RC specimens, four GFRP-CFFT specimens, and four GFRP bar–reinforced GFRP-CFFT specimens with an outer diameter of 205–206 mm and a height of 800–812 mm. The specimens were tested under concentric and 25- and 50-mm eccentric axial loads and four-point load. The experimental results showed that GFRP bar–reinforced GFRP-CFFT specimens sustained higher peak axial loads, axial and lateral deformations at peak axial load, and flexural loads than GFRP-CFFT specimens without reinforcing GFRP bars and steel RC specimens. Axial load and bending moment (P-M) interactions of GFRP-CFFT specimens with and without reinforcing GFRP bars and steel RC specimens were analytically modeled. A parametric study was conducted to evaluate the effects of actual confinement ratio and GFRP bar reinforcement ratio on P-M interactions of GFRP-CFFT specimens. The P-M interactions were found to be significantly affected by both actual confinement ratio and GFRP bar reinforcement ratio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: