Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rat brain slices, prelabeled with [3H]noradrenaline, were superfused and exposed to K+ depolarization (10-120 mM K+) or to veratrine (1-25 microM). In the absence of extracellular Ca2+ veratrine, in contrast to K+-depolarization, caused a substantial release of [3H]noradrenaline, which was completely blocked by tetrodotoxin (0.3 microM). The Ca2+ antagonist Cd2+ (50 microM), which strongly reduced K+-induced release in the presence of 1.2 mM Ca2+, did not affect release induced by veratrine in the absence of extracellular Ca2+. Ruthenium red (10 microM), known to inhibit Ca2+-entry into mitochondria, enhanced veratrine-induced [3H]noradrenaline release. Compared with K+ depolarization in the presence of 1.2 mM Ca2+, veratrine in the absence of Ca2+ caused a somewhat delayed release of [3H]noradrenaline. Further, in contrast to the fractional release of [3H]noradrenaline induced by continuous K+ depolarization in the presence of 1.2 mM Ca2+, that induced by prolonged veratrine stimulation in the absence of Ca2+ appeared to be more sustained. The data strongly suggest that veratrine-induced [3H]noradrenaline release in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ is brought about by a mobilization of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, e.g., mitochondria, subsequent to a strongly increased intracellular Na+ concentration. This provides a model for establishing the site of action of drugs that alter the stimulus-secretion coupling process in central noradrenergic nerve terminals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoffelmeer et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: