Characteristics of lake-effect snowstorms associated with the Great Salt Lake are described. Using WSR-88D radar imagery, 16 well-defined and 18 marginal lake-effect events were identified from September 1994 through May 1998 (excluding June–August), with the former used for more detailed analysis. Precipitation during the well-defined events was frequently characterized by the irregular development of radar echoes over and downstream of the Great Salt Lake. The most commonly observed precipitation structures were solitary wind-parallel bands that developed along or near the major axis of the GSL and broad-area precipitation shields with embedded convective elements that formed near the southern shoreline. Regional-scale composite analyses and rawinsonde-derived statistics showed that the lake-effect events occurred in post frontal westerly to northerly 700-hPa flow following the passage of an upper-level trough and associated low-level cold front. The lake-effect environment was characterized by limited steering layer (800–600 hPa) directional shear (generally 60° or less), moist- to dry-adiabatic low-level lapse rates, and small convective available potential energy (CAPE), although the CAPE may be locally greater over the Great Salt Lake. In all events, the lake–700-hPa temperature difference exceeded 16°C, which roughly corresponds to a dry-adiabatic lapse rate. The lake–land temperature difference was always positive and usually exceeded 6°C, indicating significant potential for the development of land-breeze circulations and associated low-level convergence over the lake. Radar-derived statistics suggest that lake enhancement is strongest during periods of northwesterly to northerly flow and large lake–land temperature differences. These characteristics are compared with those associated with lake-effect snowstorms of the Great Lakes and implications for operational forecasting are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steenburgh et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: