The detection of the gravitational waves emitted in the capture process of a compact object by a massive black hole (MBH) is known as an extreme-mass ratio inspiral (EMRI), it represents a unique probe of gravity in the strong regime, and it is one of the main targets of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). The possibility of observing a compact-object EMRI at the Galactic Center (GC) when LISA is taking data is very low. However, the capture of a brown dwarf, an X-MRI, is more frequent because these objects are much more abundant and can plunge without being tidally disrupted. An X-MRI covers some ~10⁸ cycles before merger, and hence stays on band for millions of years. About 2×10⁶ yrs before merger they have a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the GC of 10. Later, 10⁴ yrs before merger, the SNR is of several thousands, and 10³ yrs before the merger a few 10⁴. Based on these values, this kind of EMRIs is also detectable at neighbor MBHs, albeit with fainter SNRs. We calculate the event rate of X-MRIs at the GC taking into account the asymmetry of pro- and retrograde orbits on the location of the last stable orbit (LSO). We estimate that at any given moment, and using a conservative approach, there are of the order of 20 sources in band. From these, 5 are circular and are located at higher frequencies, and about 15 are highly eccentric and are at lower frequencies. Because of their proximity, X-MRIs represent a unique probe of gravity in the strong regime. The mass ratio for a X-MRI at the GC is q~10⁸, i.e., 3 orders of magnitude larger than stellar-mass black hole EMRIs. Since backreaction depends on q, the orbit more closely follows a standard geodesic, which means that approximations work better in the calculation of the orbit. X-MRIs can be sufficiently loud so as to track the systematic growth of their SNR, which can be high enough to bury that of MBH binaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pau Amaro‐Seoane (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: