Why the study?
Do lidocaine, ajmaline, and diltiazem increase ventricular defibrillation energy requirements in isolated rabbit hearts?
Do lidocaine, ajmaline, and diltiazem increase ventricular defibrillation energy requirements in isolated rabbit hearts?
Lidocaine, ajmaline, and diltiazem cause a dose-dependent increase in defibrillation energy requirements in isolated rabbit hearts, suggesting a potential risk for device failure in patients with ICDs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May raise defibrillation thresholds in ICD patients; hypothesis-generating and requires clinical validation before practice change.
The majority of patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) require antiarrhythmic (AR) drugs. ARs may increase defibrillation energy requirements. This study investigated the effects of lidocaine, ajmaline, and diltiazem on ventricular defibrillation energy needs. In 24 isolated rabbit hearts, the 50 and 80% successful defibrillation energy (ED50, ED80) was calculated in four phases: predrug baseline condition (phase 1), and phases 2, 3, and 4 with increasing concentrations of lidocaine, ajmaline, diltiazem (n = 18). Control experiments (n = 6) with only Tyrode's solution infusion indicated that the preparation was stable over time. Defibrillation energy requirements significantly (p < 0.05) increased with all ARs. Low, medium, and high lidocaine concentrations increased ED50 and ED80 to 146, 223, and 312% and 139, 207, and 285%, respectively. Ajmaline increased ED50 and ED80 to 133, 175, and 251% and 135, 208, and 285%, respectively. Diltiazem increased ED50 and ED80 by 175, 236, and 334% and 158, 212, and 286%, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate a dose-dependent increase in defibrillation energy requirements by using lidocaine, diltiazem, and ajmaline. In patients with ICDs, administration of these drugs might cause a critical increase in defibrillation energy requirements, resulting in device failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anvari et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: