Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs 833 and D4H1) directed against human factor VIII (FVIII) have been produced on a large scale to measure VIII:CAg by two-site ELISA (Asserachrom VIII:CAg, Diagnostica Stago). F(ab')2 from MoAb 833 were used for coating and bound VIII:CAg was revealed with MoAb D4H1 coupled to peroxidase. Control plasma (100 VIII:CAg U dL-1 by comparing with the International Standard) was used as reference. The assay sensitivity was 0.1 U dL-1 VIII:CAg. No apparent effect of the plasma proteins was observed provided plasma dilution was > or = 5. Thus this ELISA allowed us to estimate VIII:CAg levels of 0.5 U dL-1 in plasma. Levels of VIII:CAg were similar to those of VIII:C (correlation coefficient r = 0.87) in plasma from normal individuals (32 cases) and in patients with von Willebrand disease of various types (30 cases). Among 294 patients with haemophilia A (HA), 161 had severe HA (VIII:C < 1 U dL-1). Among those patients, 124 were cross-reacting material (CRM) negative with undetectable VIII:CAg and 37 were CRM+ (VIII:CAg 1-31 U dL-1). In 42 patients with moderate HA (VIII:C 1-5 U dL-1), 33 were CRM reduced (VIII:CAg 0.5-8 U dL-1) and nine were CRM+ with a VIII:CAg/VIII:C ratio of 6-91 (mean 34.3). In mild HA (91 cases with VIII:C > or = 6 U dL-1), 29 patients were classified as CRM+ (VIII:C 6-57 U dL-1, VIII:CAg 17-130 U dL-1 and VIII:CAg/VIII:C ratio 1.8-13.7 (mean 4.51)). In 62 CRM reduced patients there was a linear correlation between VIII:C (6-39 U dL-1) and VIII:CAg (2-36 U dL-1) levels (r = 0.88). In conclusion, this sensitive assay allows us to distinguish the quantitative CRM reduced and negative from the qualitative (CRM+) abnormalities in haemophilia A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girma et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: