Why the study?
Does diastolic deceleration half time measured by TTD echocardiography predict wall motion recovery in patients with anterior AMI?
Does diastolic deceleration half time measured by TTD echocardiography predict wall motion recovery in patients with anterior AMI?
Transthoracic Doppler-determined diastolic deceleration half time is a useful non-invasive predictor of myocardial viability and functional recovery after anterior AMI.
DHT by TTD echocardiography may support noninvasive viability assessment after anterior AMI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The diastolic deceleration slope of coronary flow velocity is steeper in patients with substantial 'no reflow' phenomenon than in those without it. This study investigated whether functional outcomes in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be predicted by analyzing the coronary flow velocity pattern recorded with transthoracic Doppler (TTD) echocardiography. Coronary blood flow velocity in the distal left anterior descending coronary artery was recorded with TTD at day-2 after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/Stent in 51 patients with anterior AMI and the diastolic deceleration half time (DHT, ms) was measured. The wall motion score index (WMSI) was measured at day-1 and -21. In the retrospective study, the DHT was much shorter in those with a poor outcome than in those with good outcome (152 +/- 109 vs 395 +/- 128 ms, p<0.05). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis documented that DHT > or = 300 ms is a suitable cut-off point (sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 93%). In the prospective study (n=30), AWMSI(dl-d21) was significantly higher in those with a DHT > or = 300 ms than those without (0.3 > or = 0.5 vs 1.6 > or = 0.7, p<0.001). DHT correlated significantly with AWMSI(dl-d21) (r=0.76, p<0.001). Patients with a shorter DHT of diastolic coronary flow velocity have a poorer functional outcome among patients with anterior AMI. The TTD-determined DHT is a useful predictor of myocardial viability after an anterior AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shintani et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: