Why the study?
Is the rs58238559 variant in ABCB4 associated with the development of lone atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation?
Is the rs58238559 variant in ABCB4 associated with the development of lone atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation?
The rare missense variant rs58238559 in the ABCB4 gene is significantly associated with the development of lone atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation.
rs58238559 may be linked to lone AF/flutter risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Lone atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common and sometimes consequential cardiac conduction disorders with a strong heritability, as underlined by recent genome-wide association studies that identified genetic modifiers. Follow-up family-based genetic analysis also identified Mendelian transmission of disease alleles. Three affected members were exome-sequenced for the identification of potential causative mutations, which were subsequently validated by direct sequencing in the other 3 affected members. Taqman assay was then used to confirm the role of any mutation in an independent population of sporadic lone AFL/AF cases. RESULTS: The family cluster analysis provided evidence of genetic inheritance of AFL in the family via autosomal dominant transmission. The exome-sequencing of 3 family members identified 7 potential mutations: of these, rs58238559, a rare missense genetic variant in the ATP-binding cassette sub-family B, member 4 (ABCB4) gene was carried by all affected members. Further analysis of 82 subjects with sporadic lone AF, 63 subjects with sporadic lone AFL, and 673 controls revealed that the allele frequency for this variation was significantly higher in cases than in the controls (0.05 vs. 0.01; OR = 3.73; 95% CI = 1.16-11.49; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: rs58238559 in ABCB4 is a rare missense variant with a significant effect on the development of AFL/AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maciąg et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: