Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
XR11576, a novel phenazine, was developed as an inhibitor of both topoisomerase I and II. This study characterized the ability of XR11576 to inhibit both enzymes, and determined its in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy against a number of murine and human tumor models. XR11576 was a potent inhibitor of purified topoisomerase I and IIalpha, and exhibited similar potency for both enzymes. The compound stabilized enzyme-DNA cleavable complexes indicating that it acted as a topoisomerase poison. The DNA cleavage patterns obtained with XR11576 were different from those induced by camptothecin and etoposide, which are topoisomerase I and II poisons, respectively. XR11576 demonstrated potent cytotoxic activity against a variety of human and murine tumor cell lines (IC50=6-47 nM). Its activity profile was comparable to or better than that of many widely used anticancer drugs. Moreover, XR11576 was unaffected by multidrug resistance (MDR) mediated by overexpression of either P-glycoprotein or MDR-associated protein, or by down-regulation of topoisomerase II. The latter property supports the dual inhibitory mechanism of action of the compound. XR11576 exhibited a similar pharmacokinetic profile in mice and rats after either i.v. or p.o. administration. In vivo XR11576 showed marked efficacy against a number of tumors including sensitive (H69/P) and multidrug-resistant (H69/LX4) small cell lung cancer and the relatively refractory MC26 and HT29 colon carcinomas following i.v. and p.o. administration. The efficacy of XR11576 was at least comparable to that of TAS-103, originally proposed as a dual inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II. These results suggest that XR11576 is a promising new antitumor agent with oral and i.v. activity, and warrants further development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mistry et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: