The critical temperature of an underdoped cuprate superconductor is limited by its phase stiffness ρ. In this paper we argue that the dependence of ρ on doping x should be understood as a consequence of deleterious competition with antiferromagnetism at large electron densities, rather than as evidence for pairing of holes in the $x=0$ Mott insulator state. ρ is suppressed at small x because the correlation energy of a d-wave superconductor has a significant pairing-wave-vector dependence when antiferromagnetic fluctuations are strong.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: