Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To compare two Gaussian diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) models including mono-exponential and bi-exponential, with the non-Gaussian kurtosis model in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods After written informed consent, 15 consecutive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent free-breathing DWI (1.5T, b-values: 0, 50, 150, 200, 300, 600 and 1000s/mm 2 ). Mean values of DWI-derived metrics ADC, D, D*, f, K and D K were calculated from multiple regions of interest in all tumours and non-tumorous parenchyma and compared. Area under the curve was determined for all metrics. Results Mean ADC and D K showed significant differences between tumours and non-tumorous parenchyma (both P <0.001). Area under the curve for ADC, D, D*, f, K, and D K were 0.77, 0.52, 0.53, 0.62, 0.42, and 0.84, respectively. Conclusion ADC and D K could differentiate tumours from non-tumorous parenchyma with the latter showing a higher diagnostic accuracy. Correction for kurtosis effects has the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kartalis et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: