The calculation of the scattered-wave amplitude by a hard-corrugated-wall potential is reduced to the determination of a source function, which is then calculated by application of an appropriate boundary condition. We discuss and compare the general features of the solution given by three different boundary conditions: (i) setting the wave function equal to zero on the corrugated surface, (ii) setting the wave function equal to zero on a plane beneath the surface, and (iii) the Rayleigh condition. It is argued that only the first of these three methods will always produce a solution. Detailed comparisons are made for the case of a triangular corrugation profile, and we show that the application of boundary conditions on the surface always gives a solution. However, it is argued that the other two methods cannot produce a convergent solution for this profile, and these conclusions are supported by numerical calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armand et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: