OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether plain radiographs interpreted by doctors working in a paediatric ED need reporting by radiologists. METHODS: Prospective observational study based in a paediatric teaching hospital. RESULTS: The overall disagreement rate was 26.1%. The clinically significant disagreement rate was 4.8%. There was no relationship between seniority or confidence of ED doctor, and likelihood of disagreement. Disagreement was more likely where radiographs were interpreted during normal working hours (P < 0.05). Chest films, then abdominal films, then skeletal films were more likely to result in disagreement (P < 0.0001). However, this relationship was reversed when considering rates of clinically significant disagreement (P < 0.05). The highest risk of disagreement was in chest films initially thought to be normal, and the lowest in skeletal films initially thought to be abnormal. CONCLUSION: All radiographs requested on patients discharged from the paediatric ED should be reported. Reporting need not be immediate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higginson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: