Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The crystal structures of the complexes [PdMe(β-dik)(PPh3)][β-dik = acetylacetonate (acac) or monothioacetylacetonate (sacac)] and [PtEt(β-dik)(PPh3)] have been determined. All four complexes crystallize inthe triclinic space group P with two molecules in the unit cell. They have a slightly distorted square-planar geometry. For the pair of acac complexes O(1)–Pd–O(2) 88.8(2), O(1)–Pt–O(2) 89.2(2), C(O)–Pd–P 88.3(2) and C(O)–Pt–P 92.7(2)°; Pd-C 2.003(9), Pt–C 2.013(9), Pd-P 2.209(2) and Pt–P 2.182(2)Å. for the two sacac complexes, S(1)–Pd–O(2) 91.35(9), S(1)–Pt–O(2) 91.59(9), C(O)–Pd–S(1) 86.4(2) and C(O)–Pt–S(1) 86.8(1)°; Pd-C 2.033(7), Pt–C 2.058(6)Å, Pd-P 2.274(1)Å. Comparison of the M–C bonds in the structures shows a slight lengthening in complexes containing the sacac ligand, consistent with the previously observed enhanced carbonylation activity of the platinum sacac complex over that of the analogus acac compound. A comparison of M–P bonds reveals that those of Pt are consistently shorter than those of Pd, in agreement with proposed relative and bond strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavell et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: