Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The daily rhythm of body temperature was recorded in control rats fed ad libitum and subsequently fed during daytime 50% of ad libitum food intake. Aside from the expression of a feeding-associated component, body temperature rhythm was phase advanced (7 h) by a timed caloric restriction; the new plateau of the acrophase of the nocturnal peak was close to the light-dark transition. A lesion of serotonergic (5-HTergic) terminals in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN)-the endogenous circadian clock(s)-was performed by microinjection of the 5-HT neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT). During the ad libitum-fed state, the acrophase of body temperature rhythm was not modified by the 5,7-DHT treatment. In response to a timed caloric restriction, however, the phase advance of the nocturnal peak of body temperature rhythm was reduced by 2 h in rats with 5,7-DHT lesions as compared to that of sham-operated rats. Magnitude and day-night pattern of wheel-running activity between the two groups of rats also were analyzed. No intergroup difference was found in the amount of wheel-running activity prior to the time of feeding. Moreover, the phase advance of nocturnal component of locomotor activity rhythm observed toward the time of feeding in sham-operated rats was limited by 5,7-DHT treatment. It is concluded that the photic synchronization of body temperature rhythm does not depend on the 5-HTergic projection to SCN under ad libitum conditions. By contrast, the phase-advancing property of a timed caloric restriction on the daily rhythm of body temperature is mediated by a neuronal circuit involving the 5-HTergic projection to SCN. That the phase advance was not fully eliminated by 5,7-DHT treatment suggests that other pathways participate in this mediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Challet et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: