Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ship design is often multidisciplinary involving several design elements with various types of objectives and constraints (O/C), some easily described as mathematical formulas, others better modeled as descriptive assertions. This paper describes a method based on fuzzy functions and an integrated performance index to model O/C using descriptive assertions to be used with mathematical formulas in optimization. Another issue addressed in this paper concerns the coordination of design elements when sequentially coupled, that is, when one leads the other and the performance of the follower depends greatly on the design of the leader. Based on neuro‐fuzzy techniques, the method described here coordinates and optimizes sequentially coupled elements. The two methods are applied to machinery arrangement (MA) and pipe routing (PR). Preliminary models for optimization of MA and PR are described considering convenience, producibility, engine room size, interference and location as factors in the O/C set. Some test results from MA/PR applications are presented and discussed. The methods are generic and can be extended to other elements in ship design. They are mutually independent and may be used separately. Two advantages of their use are an improvement in overall performance and a reduction in the need for redesign of elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: