Why the study?
CTEPH diagnosis requires invasive measurement of mPAP during RHC, whereas 4D flow MRI could potentially provide non-invasive parameters to estimate mPAP.
Does vortex duration measured by 4D flow MRI correlate with mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with suspected CTEPH?
Does vortex duration measured by 4D flow MRI correlate with mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with suspected CTEPH?
Vortex duration measured by 4D flow MRI is a reliable, non-invasive parameter that correlates strongly with invasively measured mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with suspected CTEPH.
Vortex duration on 4D flow MRI correlates with mPAP; leaves open noninvasive estimation of pulmonary pressure in suspected CTEPH.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is one of the causes of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and requires invasive measurement of the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) during right heart catheterisation (RHC) for the diagnosis. 4D flow MRI could provide non-invasive parameters to estimate the mPAP. Twenty-five patients with suspected CTEPH underwent cardiac MRI. Mean vortex duration (%), pulmonary distensibility, right ventricular volumes and function were measured using 4D flow MRI and cine sequences, and compared with the mPAP measured by RHC. The mPAP measured during RHC was 33 ± 16 mmHg (10−66 mmHg). PH (defined as mPAP > 20 mmHg) was present in 19 of 25 patients (76%). A vortical flow was observed in all but two patients (92%) on 4D flow images, and vortex duration showed good correlation with the mPAP (r = 0.805; p < 0.0001). Youden index analysis showed that a vortex duration of 8.6% of the cardiac cycle provided a 95% sensitivity and an 83% specificity to detect PH. Reliability for the measurement of vortex duration was excellent for both intra-observer ICC = 0.823 and inter-observer ICC = 0.788. Vortex duration could be a useful parameter to non-invasively estimate mPAP in patients with suspected CTEPH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deux et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: