Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are short-latency muscle potentials measured from the neck (cervical VEMP; cVEMP) or under the eyes (ocular VEMP; oVEMP), which provide information regarding function of the saccule and utricle, respectively. VEMPs are reliable when performed in adults; however, reliability of VEMPs in children is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine the test-retest reliability of c- and oVEMP testing in normal control children. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENTS: Ten adults, 14 adolescent children and 13 young children with normal hearing. INTERVENTIONS: c- and oVEMP testing were completed across two test sessions in response to air-conduction 500 Hz tone-burst and impulse hammer stimuli. Additionally, oVEMP was completed using eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the reliability of c- and oVEMP outcomes. RESULTS: When using air-conduction stimuli, c- and oVEMP amplitudes are reliable across test sessions in normal control children and adults. With impulse hammer stimuli, cVEMP amplitudes showed high reliability; however, oVEMP amplitudes showed low reliability in both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Comparison between eyes-open and eyes-closed oVEMP conditions revealed shorter latencies and higher peak-to-peak amplitudes in the eyes-open condition. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort of normal control children, cVEMPs are reliable using air-conduction and impulse hammer stimuli and oVEMPs are reliable using air-conduction stimuli in the eyes-open condition. oVEMP in eyes-closed conditions were less reliable compared with eyes-open conditions and resulted in a large number of absent responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuemmeler et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: