Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of two processing methods, aqueous extraction and autoclaving (120°C, 1 kg.cm·2, 2 hours) for detoxifying linseed (Linum usitatissimum.) and sesame meals (Sesamum indicum) on their nutritive value as a protein source for common carp was evaluated. Growth and feed utilization of carp fed diets with 25% of the total protein replaced by linseed or sesame seeds, which are either untreated, heat treated or aqueous extracted, were compared to a control diet with fishmeal as the sole protein source. The s even diets were made isonitrogenous (40% protein) and isocaloric (4.4 KcaJ.g·1) and were fed to carp initially weighing 3.3 g in three replicate tanks. Both methods of processing did not alter significantly the proximate and amino acid composition of the meals. Phytic acid contents were reduced by 48.2-71.8% and 50.8- 7 4.0% in linseed .and sesame meals, respectively with heat treatment resulting in greater reduction. Hydrocyanic acid content in linseed meal was reduced by 34.4-53.1%, with aqueous treatment resulting in the greater reduction. The results of the feeding trial showed that use of detoxified meals in diets significantly (P < 0.05) improved growth performance and food utilization of carp compared to those fed untreated meals but not to a level of performance obtained with a fishmeal based control diet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M.A. HOSSAIN (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: