Why the study?
The study was conducted to operationalise a conceptual framework for contiguous hospitalisation episodes using discharge abstracts and quantify the bias caused by using first abstract episodes that ignore hospital transfers.
Does using contiguous hospitalisation episodes compared to first abstract episodes change the reported rates of surgery, surgical delay, and death in hip fracture patients?
Does using contiguous hospitalisation episodes compared to first abstract episodes change the reported rates of surgery, surgical delay, and death in hip fracture patients?
Failing to account for hospital transfers in hip fracture patients underestimates surgical rates, surgical delays, and postoperative mortality.
Single-episode abstracts underestimate hip fracture surgery and delay rates in registries; supports linked-episode methods in observational research but leaves practice implications open.
OBJECTIVE: We describe steps to operationalise a published conceptual framework for a contiguous hospitalisation episode using acute care hospital discharge abstracts. We then quantified the degree of bias induced by a first abstract episode, which does not account for hospital transfers. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: All acute care hospitals in nine Canadian provinces. PARTICIPANTS: We retrieved acute hospitalisation discharge abstracts for 189 448 patients aged 65 years and older admitted to acute care with hip fracture between 2003 and 2013. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of patients treated surgically, delayed to surgery (defined as two or more days after admission) and dying, between contiguous hospitalisation episodes and the first abstract episodes of care. RESULTS: Using contiguous hospitalisation episodes, 91.6% underwent surgery, 35.7% were delayed two or more days after admission and 6.7% died postoperatively, whereas, using the first abstract only, these percentages were 83.7%, 32.5% and 6.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that not accounting for hospital transfers when evaluating the association between surgical timing and death underestimates reporting of the percentage of patients treated surgically and delayed to surgery by 9%, and the percentage who die after surgery by 3%. Researchers must be aware of this potential and avoidable bias as, depending on the purpose of the study, erroneous inferences may be drawn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheehan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: