Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops a dialectical geopolitics–geoeconomics framework for interpreting the restructuring of globalization and the emergence of a multipolar energy era. It operationalizes nine dialectical prerequisites as a diagnostic “protocol” for international relations/international political economy (IR/IPE): specify endogenous contradictions, trace strategic countermoves, and assess whether interaction stabilizes through provisional syntheses or moves toward fragmentation. The framework is then mapped onto energy‐specific mechanisms and illustrated across three fields: oil market management and shale‐driven elasticity, pipeline gas interdependence, and the renewables/critical‐minerals transition. The paper argues that contemporary multipolarity is best understood as an emergent synthesis produced by contradictions within the “unipolar era,” and it shows why energy transitions can be destructive and generative at once: they erode inherited dependencies even as they accelerate new infrastructures, alliances, and industrial strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimos Chatzinikolaou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: