Environmental survey reveals low baseline gamma exposure across most recreational beach sands with isolated radiation hotspots, indicating minimal risk for short-term visitors.
Beach sands may contain elevated concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides because of sediment provenance, hydraulic sorting and local accumulation of heavy minerals. This study establishes an HPGe-based radiological baseline for beach sands from Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, and evaluates external gamma exposure through an uncertainty-propagated screening approach. Forty-seven surface sand samples were collected from recreational beach sectors and analysed by high-purity germanium gamma-ray spectrometry. Activity concentrations of ²²⁶Ra, ²²⁸Ra, ²²⁸Th and ⁴⁰K were determined, and their reported analytical uncertainties were propagated to derived exposure quantities. To avoid double counting when applying a conventional whole-series thorium dose coefficient, a central ²³²Th-series screening equivalent was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the ²²⁸Ra and ²²⁸Th indicators. Sensitivity calculations using ²²⁸Ra alone and ²²⁸Th alone were also performed. Activity concentrations ranged from 1.10 to 1408.10 Bq kg⁻¹ for ²²⁶Ra, 0.03 to 5449.93 Bq kg⁻¹ for ²²⁸Ra, 0.42 to 6957.21 Bq kg⁻¹ for ²²⁸Th and 2.07 to 1008.36 Bq kg⁻¹ for quantified ⁴⁰K results. Canto was the dominant point-specific anomaly, with a central calculated absorbed dose-rate estimate of 4420 ± 169 nGy h⁻¹. Excluding Canto, the mean absorbed dose rate was 38.6 nGy h⁻¹, whereas the complete-dataset median was 16.8 nGy h⁻¹. Under all three thorium-series assumptions, the same eight sampling points exceeded the comparative outdoor value of 55 nGy h⁻¹ and only Canto exceeded 1 mSv y⁻¹ under the frequent local-use scenario. All short-term tourist-use estimates remained below 0.3 mSv y⁻¹. The 55 nGy h⁻¹ value is used only for comparison and not as a regulatory or action level. Most sampling points therefore represent lower-priority external gamma exposure conditions, whereas a limited number of local anomalies require confirmatory sampling, in situ dose-rate mapping and mineralogical characterisation before any beach-wide radiological protection conclusion is drawn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neves et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: