Evaluation study reveals that machine-translated English datasets enable German cybergrooming detection, indicating that translated test data overestimates true accuracy.
Automated cybergrooming detection can support the review of large volumes of online communication, but public datasets and detection approaches remain predominantly English-centered. This study presents a reproducible workflow for constructing target-language cybergrooming datasets and detection models from English resources, demonstrated for German. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published study to construct and systematically evaluate German-language cybergrooming datasets and detection models. Four publicly available English cybergrooming datasets were converted into a shared structure and translated into informal German chat language. Translation quality was estimated using an aggregate of COMETKiwi and MetricX scores termed CometricX. Low-quality messages were retranslated and reevaluated. Cybergrooming messages were additionally augmented through German–Catalan backtranslation. The resulting datasets, with and without augmentation, were used to train and evaluate embedding-based linear support vector machines (SVMs) and ModernBERT models. Evaluation comprised translated test data and 156 manually labeled German conversations from five closed law-enforcement cases. The Perverted Justice Zig ChitChat dataset (PJZC) achieved the highest aggregate quality estimate and the most robust detection performance on real-world German conversations. In contrast, performance on machine-translated test data overestimated real-world detection performance. Furthermore, backtranslation yielded only limited and inconsistent improvements. Overall, the proposed workflow provides a practical starting point for developing target-language cybergrooming detectors while highlighting careful source dataset selection and evaluation on authentic target-language data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaeckel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: