Survey-based pilot study reveals high team compatibility using an algorithmic matching model in plastic surgery trainees and faculty, suggesting a scalable framework for equitable mentorship.
Mentorship is a cornerstone of surgical education, fostering professional growth, research productivity, and career guidance. In plastic surgery, mentorship profoundly impacts career choices and professional development, yet structured one-on-one programs are notably limited. Challenges such as time constraints, mismatched expectations, and disparities in representation often hinder traditional mentorship models. To address these issues, we developed a computational algorithm to facilitate team-based mentorship in plastic surgery. This algorithm utilizes a weighted Jaccard similarity index and recursive stability optimization to optimize compatibility among participants by aligning career goals, clinical interests, and mentorship priorities. A survey of 171 Professional Resource Opportunities in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Education and Leadership (PROPEL) members informed the pilot matching process, resulting in 36 teams with a median pooled similarity score of 0.823. Our approach offers distinct advantages, including equitable opportunity, scalability, and reduced administrative burden. Future efforts should focus on integrating qualitative feedback, evaluating long-term outcomes, and exploring advanced technologies such as natural language processing to refine the model further.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katave et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: