Systematic review and meta-analysis reveals a 6.3% incidence of traumatic optic neuropathy after craniofacial trauma, indicating frequent severe vision loss and poor recovery rates.
Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is an uncommon but vision-threatening complication of craniofacial and orbital trauma, and reliable estimates of its incidence and visual outcomes are needed to inform prognosis and clinical decision-making. We conducted a prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251235951) to determine the literature-pooled incidence of TON after craniofacial trauma. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 9 August 2025 for observational studies or randomized trials reporting TON incidence following craniofacial trauma. Study, patient, and injury characteristics were extracted; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-E tool and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Pooled incidence estimates were generated using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions with Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation, with preplanned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria (7,896 eyes; 7,871 patients). The pooled incidence of TON was 6.3% (95% CI 3.30–11.80), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 94.6%) and study-level estimates ranging from 1.0% to 44.0%. Excluding high risk-of-bias studies yielded a pooled incidence of 7.9% (95% CI 3.20–18.30; I2 = 94.5%). Incidence estimates were similar between trauma/tertiary centers and smaller hospital-based cohorts (6.0%, 95% CI 0.03–0.13). Visual outcomes were consistently poor: across six studies, most patients presented with profound visual loss and recovery was uncommon. Overall, very low-certainty evidence suggests that TON occurs in approximately 6.3% of patients following craniofacial trauma, underscoring the need for prospective studies to refine incidence estimates and better define prognostic factors and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: