Preclinical study demonstrates that GDF11-enhanced macrophage nanovesicles accelerate skin wound closure in mice, highlighting a cell-free biomaterial approach for tissue regeneration.
Cutaneous wound healing is strongly influenced by innate immune–stromal crosstalk. Here, we engineered GDF11-enhanced M2 macrophage–derived nanovesicles (M2G-NV) and evaluated their reparative activity, with mechanistic evidence supporting involvement of PI3K/AKT signaling and CCND1 upregulation in fibroblast responses. Macrophages were enhanced with GDF11 to produce extrusion-derived nanovesicles, which were characterized. Efficacy was validated in vitro and in a murine full-thickness wound model with topical GelMA hydrogel delivery. Pathway insights were derived from transcriptome (RNA-seq) enrichment analyses, and PI3K inhibition was used to probe the PI3K/AKT–CCND1 axis. GDF11 increased M2 polarization and yielded M2G-NV that enhanced fibroblast proliferation and migration in vitro (EdU, CCK-8, scratch and Transwell assays). In vivo, topical GelMA/M2G-NV accelerated wound closure (day 3: 24.60% vs 19.90% [GelMA/M2-NV] vs 14.92% control; day 5: 85.45% vs 81.36% vs 62.21%), with improved histology and pro-repair markers. Transcriptomic enrichment together with PI3K inhibition supported involvement of the PI3K/AKT–CCND1 axis, and GelMA encapsulation preserved vesicle bioactivity. This study introduces GDF11-enhanced M2 nanovesicles (M2G-NV) delivered topically via GelMA hydrogel. Mechanistically, our data support involvement of the PI3K/AKT–CCND1 axis in M2G-NV-induced fibroblast responses. Their cell-free nature, topical deployability, and scalability indicate promising potential for clinical translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: