Simulation study demonstrates a fourfold reduction in beamforming computation time for circular antenna arrays, highlighting the feasibility of multiplier-free FPGA deployment.
This study focuses on accelerating adaptive beamforming in the Multicarrier Wireless Internet Local Loop (McWiLL) professional radio communication system using “Korona” ring smart antennas. The work investigates algorithms for calculating complex weight coefficients in an eight-element uniform circular antenna array. The main objective is to reduce beam pattern adaptation time while maintaining interference suppression depth and robustness under multipath propagation. To achieve this, an ensemble machine learning approach based on the Random Forest algorithm is employed to approximate the optimal Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) solution using elements of the sample covariance matrix of received signals. The training dataset is generated through McWiLL channel simulations considering mutual coupling between array elements, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) variation, and different angles of arrival of the desired and interfering signals. The proposed method is evaluated against the classical MVDR algorithm in terms of radiation pattern null depth, robustness to phase distortions, and inference time on a Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) hardware platform. Results demonstrate that the Random Forest-based approach achieves more than a fourfold reduction in computation time while forming radiation-pattern nulls of about 30–35 dB toward the interferers (versus 44–46 dB for the classical MVDR); the synthesized core uses no hardware multipliers (DSP48), and its functional equivalence to the software model is confirmed by bit-exact RTL co-simulation. The findings show promise for deployment in McWiLL base stations and other professional radio systems requiring fast, adaptive beamforming under dynamic channel conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalmatov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: