Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals five distinct pulmonary toxicity phenotypes in individuals exposed to kratom, highlighting the need to evaluate herbal alkaloids in unexplained acute lung injury.
Introduction Kratom use has increased, including concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine products, but pulmonary toxicity has not been systematically synthesized. Methods We systematically reviewed human case reports, conference abstracts, and forensic/autopsy series describing pulmonary outcomes after kratom, mitragynine, or 7-hydroxymitragynine exposure (PROSPERO CRD420261427143). Five databases were searched through 24 June 2026. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and appraised reports; causality was graded using Naranjo criteria for clinical reports and WHO-UMC criteria for forensic reports. Synthesis was narrative. Results Twenty-four reports were included: 14 clinical and 10 forensic. Five categories were identified in two tiers: primary pulmonary syndromes—diffuse alveolar hemorrhage ( n = 3), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)/diffuse acute lung injury ( n = 3), and eosinophilic/hypersensitivity pneumonitis ( n = 2)—and secondary consequences of systemic toxicity—central respiratory depression ( n = 6) and post-mortem pulmonary edema/congestion ( n = 10). All clinical patients survived; all forensic decedents died. Attribution was Probable in 9 reports, Possible in 13, and Unlikely in 2. Pulmonary edema/congestion was the most common forensic finding but was nonspecific; single-agent fatalities had high mitragynine concentrations (2,325–7,500 ng/mL). Conclusions Reported kratom-associated pulmonary presentations cluster into five provisional, hypothesis-generating categories spanning primary lung injury and secondary systemic effects. Clinicians should consider kratom and 7-hydroxymitragynine in unexplained acute lung injury, alveolar hemorrhage, eosinophilic pneumonitis, or opioid-type respiratory depression; targeted toxicology and standardized reporting are needed to refine this framework. Registration PROSPERO CRD420261427143.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanchustambham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: