Key result
Standard sedation and general anaesthesia for catheter ablation show low complication rates across 110 studies.
Why the study?
Anaesthetic techniques for catheter ablation vary globally, and the optimal strategy has yet to be determined.
What are the current anaesthetic techniques used for catheter ablations and their associated outcomes?
Systematic Review (n=110)
What are the current anaesthetic techniques used for catheter ablations and their associated outcomes?
This scoping review highlights that while general anaesthesia, deep sedation, and conscious sedation are widely and safely used for catheter ablation, significant heterogeneity in definitions and outcome reporting necessitates standardized future research.
These techniques appear safe with high satisfaction; heterogeneity leaves open standardized definitions and outcome reporting in future trials.
Background Cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, have rising prevalence and represent a growing global health burden. Catheter ablation is a commonly used treatment demanding sedation or anaesthesia for comfort, stability and safety. Anaesthetic techniques vary globally, and the optimal strategy has yet to be determined. The objective of this scoping review was to map the current literature on anaesthesia for catheter ablation, identifying how it has been investigated and which evidence gaps exist. Methods This scoping review followed a pre‐published protocol and guidelines. A search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus, with no restrictions on publication year or language. Eligible studies were primary studies involving adult patients undergoing catheter ablation in hospitals, clinics, or similar healthcare facilities. Results We included 110 studies published between 1991 and 2025. The reported anaesthetic techniques included General Anaesthesia (GA), Deep Sedation (DS), Conscious Sedation (CS), Minimal Sedation, and Local Anaesthesia (LA). Complications were infrequently reported, recovery was comparable, and patient and operator satisfaction was high across techniques. Techniques varied across regions, with GA being most frequent in North America, GA and CS in Asia, and DS in Europe. Anaesthesia quality was commonly assessed by intraprocedural respiratory and haemodynamic stability and complication rates, whilst anaesthesia effectiveness was mostly assessed using procedure duration, accumulated medication, sedation depth, and sedation failure/escalation. Conclusion This scoping review mapped current anaesthetic practices in catheter ablations. GA, DS, and CS were most frequently reported. Complications were infrequent and satisfaction high. However, evidence gaps and inconsistent definitions and assessment methods highlight the need for future research and standardisation. Editorial Comment Electrophysiological cardiac interventions such as catheter ablations commonly now also involve anaesthesiological management. This scoping review presents an update on knowledge for how this care may facilitate good procedural results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fredensborg et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac arrhythmias requiring catheter ablation (n=110). Anaesthetic techniques (General Anaesthesia, Deep Sedation, Conscious Sedation) was evaluated on Mapping of current literature on anaesthesia for catheter ablation, identifying how it has been investigated and evidence gaps. General anaesthesia, deep sedation, and conscious sedation were the most frequently reported anaesthetic techniques for catheter ablation across 110 studies, with infrequent complications and high satisfaction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: