Experimental study demonstrates high homogeneity and stability of pooled cervical cytology slides, highlighting a scalable approach for laboratory quality assessment.
Objectives External Quality Assessment (EQA) is essential for standardizing laboratory practices; however, strict requirements for slide homogeneity and stability have limited the implementation of cytology EQA in Vietnam. This study aimed to standardize a pooled-sample preparation process and optimize the Papanicolaou staining protocol for liquid-based cytology (LBC) slide production, ensuring slide homogeneity and stability in accordance with ISO/IEC 17043:2023 requirements for EQA. Methods Residual LBC specimens were pooled to generate cytology slides. An experimental design was applied to optimize fixation and staining durations for Hematoxylin, Orange G (OG), and Eosin Azure (EA). Homogeneity and stability were evaluated according to ISO/IEC 17043:2023 and ISO 13528:2022 guidelines. Results The pooled sampling methodology achieved a mean cellular density of 43,282 ± 1,063 cells per slide, demonstrating high reproducibility (CV=2.46 %). Multivariate linear regression analysis established the following predictive model for specimen quality: Y=27.667 − 0.028X 1 + 0.347X 2 + 0.375X 3 − 0.014X 4 . Based on this model, the optimized procedural protocol was defined as: Absolute Ethanol fixation for 15 min, Hematoxylin staining for 59 s and OG, EA staining for 3 min each. The optimized protocol yielded significantly high specimen quality scores (29.00 ± 0.707) with a further reduction in variability (CV=2.43 %). Statistical analysis confirmed high levels of homogeneity across all specimens and diagnostic pathological sub-groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, p>0.05). Additionally, longitudinal assessment indicated that staining quality maintained stability over a 3-month follow-up period (Friedman test, p>0.05). Conclusions A standardized pooled-sample preparation and optimized Papanicolaou staining protocol was established, ensuring high homogeneity, stability, and staining quality for cytological EQA slide production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: