The effects of temperature on the crystal structure and ionic conductivity of the compounds Ag 2 CdI 4 , Ag 2 ZnI 4 and Ag 3 SnI 5 have been investigated by powder diffraction and impedance spectroscopy techniques. ε-Ag 2 CdI 4 adopts a tetragonal crystal structure under ambient conditions and abrupt increases in the ionic conductivity are observed at 407(2), 447(3) and 532(4) K, consistent with the sequence of transitions ε-Ag 2 CdI 4 → β-Ag 2 CdI 4 + β-AgI + CdI 2 → α-AgI + CdI 2 → α-Ag 2 CdI 4 . Hexagonal β-Ag 2 CdI 4 is metastable at ambient temperature. The ambient-temperature β phase of Ag 2 ZnI 4 is orthorhombic and the structures of β-Ag 2 CdI 4 and β-Ag 2 ZnI 4 can, respectively, be considered as ordered derivatives of the wurtzite (β) and zincblende (γ) phases of AgI. On heating Ag 2 ZnI 4 , there is a 12-fold increase in ionic conductivity at 481(1) K and a further eightfold increase at 542(3) K. These changes result from decomposition of β-Ag 2 ZnI 4 into α-AgI + ZnI 2 , followed by the appearance of superionic α-Ag 2 ZnI 4 at the higher temperature. The hexagonal crystal structure of α-Ag 2 ZnI 4 is a dynamically disordered counterpart to the β modification. Ag 3 SnI 5 is only stable at temperatures in excess of 370(3) K and possesses a relatively high ionic conductivity (σ ≈ 0.19Ω −1 cm −1 at 420 K) due to dynamic disorder of the Ag + and Sn 2+ within a cubic close packed I − sublattice. The implications of these findings for the wider issue of high ionic conductivity in AgI–MI 2 compounds is discussed, with reference to recently published studies of Ag 4 PbI 6 and Ag 2 HgI 4 and new data for the temperature dependence of the ionic conductivity of the latter compound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hull et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: