Why the study?
Does acute hypoxia alter cardiovagal arterial baroreflex gain differently in individuals susceptible to hypoxic syncope compared to non-susceptible individuals?
Does acute hypoxia alter cardiovagal arterial baroreflex gain differently in individuals susceptible to hypoxic syncope compared to non-susceptible individuals?
Hypoxic syncope appears to result from the superimposed vasodilator effects of hypoxia rather than a hypoxia-induced maladjustment in baroreflex control of heart rate.
Baroreflex gain remains comparable regardless of syncope susceptibility or hypoxia; leaves open vasodilatory mechanisms as primary driver.
We tested the hypothesis that individual differences in the effect of acute hypoxia on the cardiovagal arterial baroreflex would determine individual susceptibility to hypoxic syncope. In 16 healthy, nonsmoking, normotensive subjects (8 women, 8 men, age 20-33 yr), we assessed orthostatic tolerance with a 20-min 60 degrees head-upright tilt during both normoxia and hypoxia (breathing 12% O(2)). On a separate occasion, we assessed baroreflex control of heart rate (cardiovagal baroreflex gain) using the modified Oxford technique during both normoxia and hypoxia. When subjects were tilted under hypoxic conditions, 5 of the 16 developed presyncopal signs or symptoms, and the 20-min tilt had to be terminated. These "fainters" had comparable cardiovagal baroreflex gain to "nonfainters" under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (normoxia, fainters: -1.2 +/- 0.2, nonfainters: -1.0 +/- 0.2 beats.min(-1).mmHg(-1), P = 0.252; hypoxia, fainters: -1.3 +/- 0.2, nonfainters: -1.0 +/- 0.1 beats.min(-1).mmHg(-1), P = 0.208). Furthermore, hypoxia did not alter cardiovagal baroreflex gain in either group (both P > 0.8). It appears from these observations that hypoxic syncope results from the superimposed vasodilator effects of hypoxia on the cardiovascular system and not from a hypoxia-induced maladjustment in baroreflex control of heart rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halliwill et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: