Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
During the 1920's physicists came to accept the view that matter is built of only two kinds of elementary particles, electrons and protons, which they often called “negative and positive electrons.” A neutral atom of mass number A and atomic number Z was supposed to contain A protons, all in the nucleus, and A negative electrons, A–Z in the nucleus and the rest making up the external electron shells of the atom. Their belief that both protons and negative electrons were to be found in the nucleus arose from the observations that protons could be knocked out of light elements by alpha-particle bombardment, while electrons emerged spontaneously (mostly from very heavy nuclei) in radioactive beta decay. Any other elementary constituent of the atom would have been considered superfluous, and to imagine that another might exist was abhorrent to the prevailing natural philosophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurie M. Brown (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: