Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has long been believed that the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) in motor-nerve conduction studies (MCSs) records the action potential beneath the active electrode over the muscle belly. However, recent studies have revealed the contribution of the reference electrode to the CMAP, most prominent in the tibial nerve, followed by the ulnar nerve. This "reference electrode potential" is recorded when the conventional reference electrode distal to the muscle belly is connected to a proximal reference. It must be a far-field potential (FFP) considering its distribution, although the precise mechanism of its generation has not been clarified. The conventional theory of termination of the action potential at the muscle-tendon junction is insufficient. Regarding the ulnar CMAP, interosseous muscles mostly contribute to the FFPs. New understanding of CMAP based on the FFP theory may provide new insights into the interpretation of MCSs and related techniques, including motor unit number estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masahiro Sonoo (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: